Wednesday, February 26, 2020

In the United States, a judge defends the agreement limiting the detention of migrant children

Must Read

"Weinstein avoided the worst by not being convicted of serial assault and predatory behavior"

Arnaud Leparmentier, our correspondent who followed the New York trial, answers your questions.

Martin Guzman, a disciple of Joseph Stiglitz at the bedside of Argentina

Martin Guzman, February 12, in Buenos Aires. Juan Ignacio Roncoroni / EF / SIPAHandshake, big smile, words...

Scottish Parliament votes free periodic protections

LOIC VENANCE / AFPIt is a provision without equal in the world. The Scottish Autonomous Parliament took...

The White House has tried to cancel the so-called "de Flores" agreement, limiting the detention of children to 20 days, which it deems obsolete. An attempt blocked by a California federal judge.

Time to Reading 1 min.

Children residing illegally in the United States can not be detained indefinitely. This is the message of Dolly Gee, a California federal judge who blocked Friday, Sept. 27, an attempt by the government of President Donald Trump to return to the so-called "de Flores" agreement.

Read also Trump administration wants to allow unlimited detention of migrant children

The latter stipulates that the government can not detain migrant children for more than 20 days. The White House attempted to cancel the 22-year-old deal, arguing that it had become obsolete and was not suited to cope with the massive influx of migrant families in the United States in recent years.

But for Judge Gee, the administration "Simply can not ignore the requirements of just judgment because it no longer agrees with them for political reasons"she writes.

An attempt that "violates the rule of law"

For the California judge, the government representatives did not prove the merits of their claim and could have asked the Parliament to adopt measures calling into question the Flores agreement. "In the absence of satisfaction, the defendants can not impose their will by promulgating regulations that abrogate the most fundamental principles" of the Flores agreement, "It violates the rule of law and this court can not allow it", concludes Dolly Gee.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said the administration was "Disappointed" by this decision and that she would continue to work "To restore the integrity of our immigration system".

Read also Migrant children in detention are entitled to soap, confirms US court

The lawsuit was triggered by twenty US states challenging the government's decision to repeal the current system. Last year, President Trump put in place a migration policy that led to the separation of more than 2,300 migrant children from their parents, causing heated controversy, before ending it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

"Weinstein avoided the worst by not being convicted of serial assault and predatory behavior"

Arnaud Leparmentier, our correspondent who followed the New York trial, answers your questions.

Martin Guzman, a disciple of Joseph Stiglitz at the bedside of Argentina

Martin Guzman, February 12, in Buenos Aires. Juan Ignacio Roncoroni / EF / SIPAHandshake, big smile, words of support ... Classic, the...

Scottish Parliament votes free periodic protections

LOIC VENANCE / AFPIt is a provision without equal in the world. The Scottish Autonomous Parliament took a first step on Tuesday,...

In Iran, the coronavirus, "enemy's plot"

The population doubts the figure of 95 cases of contamination advanced by the authorities.

Adrien Rabiot, a "Duke" at ease with the Old Lady

Adrien Rabiot (right) in a game against Fiorentina on February 2. MASSIMO PINCA / REUTERSFor Didier Deschamps, returns to the "Old Lady"...

More Articles Like This