Tuesday, September 22, 2020

In the United States, a judge defends the agreement limiting the detention of migrant children

Must Read

“What bequeathed to us by Ruth Bader Ginsburg”

Tribune. Icon, heroine, historical figure, rockstar… There is no lack of qualifiers to pay homage to the one the...

the 18-29 year olds vote for Joe Biden

Thanks to the Democratic convention, which inducted Joe Biden as his party's candidate for the November 3 presidential election,...

Facing China, the West is at an impasse

Chronic. Without the intervention in extremis of a judge Sunday, September 20, it would have been necessary, to use...

The White House has tried to cancel the so-called "de Flores" agreement, limiting the detention of children to 20 days, which it deems obsolete. An attempt blocked by a California federal judge.

Time to Reading 1 min.

Children residing illegally in the United States can not be detained indefinitely. This is the message of Dolly Gee, a California federal judge who blocked Friday, Sept. 27, an attempt by the government of President Donald Trump to return to the so-called "de Flores" agreement.

Read also Trump administration wants to allow unlimited detention of migrant children

The latter stipulates that the government can not detain migrant children for more than 20 days. The White House attempted to cancel the 22-year-old deal, arguing that it had become obsolete and was not suited to cope with the massive influx of migrant families in the United States in recent years.

But for Judge Gee, the administration "Simply can not ignore the requirements of just judgment because it no longer agrees with them for political reasons"she writes.

An attempt that "violates the rule of law"

For the California judge, the government representatives did not prove the merits of their claim and could have asked the Parliament to adopt measures calling into question the Flores agreement. "In the absence of satisfaction, the defendants can not impose their will by promulgating regulations that abrogate the most fundamental principles" of the Flores agreement, "It violates the rule of law and this court can not allow it", concludes Dolly Gee.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said the administration was "Disappointed" by this decision and that she would continue to work "To restore the integrity of our immigration system".

Read also Migrant children in detention are entitled to soap, confirms US court

The lawsuit was triggered by twenty US states challenging the government's decision to repeal the current system. Last year, President Trump put in place a migration policy that led to the separation of more than 2,300 migrant children from their parents, causing heated controversy, before ending it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

“What bequeathed to us by Ruth Bader Ginsburg”

Tribune. Icon, heroine, historical figure, rockstar… There is no lack of qualifiers to pay homage to the one the...

the 18-29 year olds vote for Joe Biden

Thanks to the Democratic convention, which inducted Joe Biden as his party's candidate for the November 3 presidential election, The world relaunched its campaign...

Facing China, the West is at an impasse

Chronic. Without the intervention in extremis of a judge Sunday, September 20, it would have been necessary, to use the Chinese messaging WeChat in...

For “Bad Students”, Thailand is late

Benjamaporn Nivas during a press interview in Bangkok on August 31. Sakchai Lalit / APBenjamaporn Nivas is 15 years old, she...

Novak Djokovic wins Rome Masters 1000 for the fifth time

Novak Djokovic at Foro Italico on September 21, 2020 in Rome (Italy). RICCARDO ANTIMIANI / AFPTwo weeks after his disqualification from...

More Articles Like This