Donald Trump’s former chief of staff could face criminal prosecution

Mark Meadows (left) with Donald Trump at the White House in Washington on October 21, 2021.

The pressure is mounting in the entourage of Donald Trump: American elected officials recommended, Monday, December 13, criminal proceedings against the former chief of staff of the Republican billionaire, Mark Meadows, who refuses to cooperate in their investigation into the assault on the Capitol.

This parliamentary commission, set up to understand the precise role of the ex-president and his entourage in the attack on the United States Congress on January 6, 2021, voted unanimously in favor of prosecution against the former “chief of staff ”by Donald Trump.

Read also Article reserved for our subscribers In the United States, the obstacle course of the parliamentary inquiry into the January 6 insurgency on Capitol Hill

Mark Meadows, one of the closest advisers to the tempestuous president when thousands of his supporters invaded the Capitol in an attempt to block the certification of Joe Biden’s presidential victory, is at the heart of all attention. The 62-year-old man has provided thousands of pages of official documents, emails and text messages to investigators, but refuses to testify before this commission at all costs. Mark Meadows risks prosecution, on the grounds that he tries, by his silence, “To obstruct a congressional investigation”.

“Mark Meadows’ texts and emails reveal his deep involvement in the preparation for the January 6 attack”, said the elected Jamie Raskin on Monday evening.

The final decision rests with the Ministry of Justice

In the vote on Monday, Democratic Representative Liz Cheney unveiled messages sent to Mr. Meadows on January 6 by Donald Trump Jr, the president’s son, and by figures at conservative Fox News, urging him to ask the president to speak out to push back his supporters, who were then storming Congress.

This commission recommends prosecution “Because he did not want to answer for what he knows about a brutal attack on our democracy”, said Bennie Thompson, the Democratic chairman of the special committee, on Monday.

Read also Jacob Chansley, the “Shaman QAnon” who took part in the assault on the Capitol, sentenced to nearly three and a half years in prison

The recommendation of these nine elected officials should be adopted on Tuesday in the House of Representatives before being sent to the Ministry of Justice. The final decision to indict Mark Meadows rests with him.

This former senior White House official, known to be very discreet, risks prison. His lawyer had previously denounced a process “Unfair” and ” foolish “ and has already taken legal action against the so-called “January 6” commission, the date of the assault on the Capitol.

” Witch hunt “

This group of elected officials is multiplying court orders and threats of indictment in Donald Trump’s entourage. The sulphurous Steve Bannon, one of the architects of Trump’s victory in 2016, who also snubbed the commission of inquiry, has already been indicted for the same reason. Donald Trump, anxious to avoid this threat, orders his followers to close ranks.

Read also Article reserved for our subscribers Assault on Capitol Hill: Myth of ‘political persecution’ takes hold among Trump supporters

The elected Democrat and member of the commission Adam Schiff warned in a statement that if other witnesses plan not to respond to the summons of the special commission, they could also “Risk jail”.

This group of elected officials is advancing at a forced march, with the objective of publishing their findings before the midterm elections of November 2022, in which the Republicans could regain control of the House and bury its work. Because the supporters of the former American president, on the contrary, strive to minimize this attack, qualifying the parliamentary inquiry as ” witch hunt “, one of Donald Trump’s favorite expressions.

In parallel with these battles on Capitol Hill, the so-called “January 6” commission scored a major victory last week, when an appeals court ruled that Donald Trump could not invoke presidential privileges to block the transmission to the investigation of internal communications to the White House. The former president still has a few days to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Read also Article reserved for our subscribers United States: the emotion of the police officers during the first day of the commission of inquiry into the assault on the Capitol

The World with AFP

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here